Finally a truly free unlimited converter! Convert unlimited images online – 100% free, no sign-up required
Menu
CZ | EN
Date published: April 21, 2026
Last update: April 21, 2026
Author: Marek Hovorka
Category: Image Conversion Guides
Tags: avif image optimization, convert png to avif, png to avif
Learn when it makes sense to convert PNG to AVIF, what quality and transparency changes to expect, and how to get smaller image files without hurting real-world use.
PNG is one of the most useful image formats on the web. It handles transparency well, preserves sharp edges, and works especially well for screenshots, interface elements, logos, and graphics that need clean detail. The problem is size. PNG files can become surprisingly heavy, especially when transparency, large dimensions, or detailed visuals are involved.
That is where AVIF becomes interesting.
If your goal is to keep an image looking clean while cutting file size dramatically, converting PNG to AVIF can be a very smart move. In many cases, AVIF delivers much smaller files than PNG while still supporting transparency. That makes it attractive for websites, apps, online stores, landing pages, and content-heavy blogs that need better performance.
But this is not a one-size-fits-all conversion. Some PNGs convert beautifully to AVIF. Others may need careful quality settings. And some images are better left as PNG because editing, workflow, or compatibility matters more than size savings.
In this guide, you will learn when to convert PNG to AVIF, what actually changes during conversion, how transparency behaves, what tradeoffs to watch for, and how to choose the right format for practical use. If you are ready to try it, you can use PixConverter’s PNG to AVIF converter to process your files online in a quick workflow.
The main reason is simple: smaller file size.
PNG uses lossless compression, which is great for preserving exact pixel data, but it is not always efficient for web delivery. AVIF uses much newer compression methods and can often shrink images significantly. For many graphics, product cutouts, UI assets, and web visuals, the reduction can be substantial.
That can lead to practical improvements:
Another big reason is that AVIF supports transparency. That matters because many people assume only PNG is suitable for transparent backgrounds. In reality, AVIF can preserve transparency too, which opens the door to replacing heavy transparent PNGs with much lighter files.
Before converting, it helps to understand what you are changing.
PNG is designed to preserve image detail exactly. That is why it is a favorite for editing, archiving exported graphics, and storing screenshots where clarity matters.
AVIF is more flexible. It can preserve strong quality at much smaller sizes, but many AVIF exports use lossy compression to achieve the biggest savings. That means some data may be discarded, though often very efficiently.
In practical use, this means you may trade exact pixel-perfect preservation for better compression. Whether that matters depends on the image.
This is one of the most important points. If your PNG has a transparent background, AVIF can usually keep it. That makes it suitable for:
However, edge quality should still be checked after conversion, especially on soft shadows, anti-aliased edges, and partially transparent areas.
Not every PNG should become AVIF. The best results usually happen in specific situations.
If you have transparent PNGs on a website that are slowing down page speed, AVIF is one of the first formats worth testing. Hero graphics, badges, overlays, product stickers, and decorative transparent assets often become much lighter.
Ecommerce sites often use PNG for product cutouts. That works, but large transparent PNG files can create performance problems. AVIF may preserve the same practical appearance while reducing file size enough to improve category pages and product listings.
Buttons, interface illustrations, onboarding graphics, and design assets often start as PNG. If those files are intended for final display rather than ongoing editing, AVIF can be a good delivery format.
Content publishers often use PNGs for charts, diagrams, feature images with transparency, and comparison graphics. AVIF can be a strong export option when you want lighter files without moving to a format that drops transparency.
There are also many cases where staying with PNG is smarter.
If the image is still part of your design workflow, keep the original PNG or another editable master. AVIF is better viewed as a delivery format than a working master in many projects.
Very sharp text, tiny labels, and hard-edged interface lines can sometimes show quality changes at aggressive AVIF compression levels. You may still convert them, but test carefully.
AVIF support is strong in modern environments, but if you need maximum compatibility across older tools, legacy systems, or software pipelines, PNG remains safer.
If the existing file is tiny, conversion may produce little practical benefit. In that case, the extra workflow may not be worth it.
| Feature | PNG | AVIF |
|---|---|---|
| Compression type | Usually lossless | Lossy or lossless |
| Transparency support | Yes | Yes |
| File size efficiency | Often large | Usually much smaller |
| Best for editing masters | Yes | Usually no |
| Best for web delivery | Good | Excellent when supported |
| Sharp graphics preservation | Excellent | Good to excellent depending on settings |
| Legacy compatibility | Excellent | More limited |
There is no universal percentage, because image content matters a lot. A flat logo, a detailed app screenshot, and a soft-edged transparent product image behave differently.
Still, in real-world web use, AVIF often reduces file size substantially compared with PNG. The gains can be modest on some clean graphics and dramatic on larger, more complex images. Transparent assets that were once too heavy for performance budgets often become much more manageable.
The only reliable method is to test the actual image and compare:
If you want a quick baseline, run a file through PNG to AVIF and compare the result side by side before replacing production assets.
Yes, in most normal workflows, AVIF can preserve transparency.
This is one of the strongest reasons to convert PNG to AVIF. It allows you to keep cutout objects, transparent logos, and layered web graphics while benefiting from smaller file sizes.
That said, not all transparency is equally easy to compress. You should pay attention to:
These details can still look great, but they are the first places where low-quality settings may reveal artifacts or roughness. If the result looks imperfect, increase quality or keep the original PNG for that asset.
Transparent logos used on websites can often benefit from AVIF, especially if the source PNG is larger than necessary. Always test edges and any small text.
Online stores with transparent product images can use AVIF to reduce weight on listing pages and improve loading speed.
Large decorative visuals, onboarding illustrations, and marketing graphics are often strong AVIF candidates.
Some screenshots stay better as PNG if small text clarity is critical, but others convert well enough to AVIF for article performance gains.
Transparent web assets layered over backgrounds are a common case where PNG is used by habit even though AVIF may perform better.
The safest workflow is simple.
Do not overwrite your source file. Keep the PNG as your editable or archival master.
Create an AVIF version specifically for website or app use.
Check:
If the AVIF file is much smaller and looks the same in practical viewing, the conversion is likely worthwhile.
If your audience includes older environments, you may want to keep PNG as a fallback while serving AVIF to supported browsers.
If you want a simple browser-based process, PixConverter makes it easy to convert PNG files online without a complicated setup.
Quick tool CTA: Upload your file and convert it in moments with PixConverter’s PNG to AVIF tool.
Best for: transparent web graphics, product cutouts, logos, blog assets, and lighter delivery files.
For many users, the main benefit is speed. You can test one image, compare the output, and decide immediately whether AVIF is the right production format.
If sharp edges become slightly soft, the compression setting may be too aggressive. Try a higher-quality export.
This usually appears around soft edges, shadows, or anti-aliased contours. Again, a more conservative setting often helps.
This is a common warning sign that PNG may still be the better format for that specific image.
These are less common in normal web use, but always compare side by side if brand colors are sensitive.
Image format choice does not automatically improve rankings by itself, but file size and loading performance absolutely matter in real sites.
When heavy PNGs are replaced with lighter AVIF files, you may see benefits such as:
For publishers and ecommerce teams, this is often the real value of converting PNG to AVIF. It is not just a format change. It is a performance optimization step.
Sometimes the real decision is not PNG versus AVIF, but PNG versus AVIF versus WebP.
AVIF often wins on compression efficiency, especially when minimizing file size is the top priority. WebP, however, remains a very practical middle ground with broad support and good transparency handling.
If you want to test alternatives, PixConverter also offers helpful related tools:
As a rule:
| Scenario | Convert to AVIF? | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Large transparent website graphic | Yes, usually | Strong size savings potential |
| Editable design source | No, keep PNG master | PNG is better for workflow preservation |
| Product image with transparent background | Yes, test first | Good balance of transparency and compression |
| Screenshot with tiny UI text | Maybe | Check sharpness carefully |
| Simple small icon already lightweight | Maybe not | Savings may be minimal |
| Asset for older systems or software | No or fallback needed | PNG has broader compatibility |
Not always. AVIF is usually better for smaller delivery files, especially on the web. PNG is usually better for exact lossless preservation, editing workflows, and maximum compatibility.
Yes. AVIF supports transparency, which makes it a useful replacement for many transparent PNGs.
It can, depending on the settings. Many AVIF exports are lossy, but the visual difference may be minor or invisible in normal viewing. Always compare the result before replacing the original.
No. Keep the PNG as your master file. Use AVIF as the optimized delivery copy.
Often yes, especially for website delivery. But inspect fine lines, small text, and transparent edges carefully.
Try a higher-quality setting. If the image still does not hold up well, keep it as PNG or test WebP instead.
Converting PNG to AVIF is one of the most practical ways to shrink image weight while keeping transparency available. For modern websites and apps, that can translate into faster loading, lower bandwidth use, and a cleaner performance budget without giving up the transparent backgrounds that made PNG so useful in the first place.
The key is to use it selectively.
For delivery assets, AVIF can be excellent. For master files, editing, or images where absolute crispness matters more than size, PNG still has an important role. The smartest workflow is not replacing PNG everywhere. It is keeping PNG where it belongs and exporting AVIF where it helps most.
Start with your file here: Convert PNG to AVIF on PixConverter
You may also need these related tools:
