Finally a truly free unlimited converter! Convert unlimited images online – 100% free, no sign-up required
Menu
CZ | EN
Date published: June 13, 2026
Last update: June 13, 2026
Author: Marek Hovorka
Category: Image Conversion Guides
Tags: avif image optimization, convert png to avif, png to avif, transparent image compression, website image formats
Learn when it makes sense to convert PNG to AVIF, what quality and transparency changes to expect, and how to create smaller modern images for websites, apps, and everyday publishing.
PNG is reliable, sharp, and widely supported, but it is also one of the heaviest image formats used on modern websites. If you are working with interface graphics, screenshots, product cutouts, transparent assets, or web visuals that need to stay crisp while loading quickly, it often makes sense to convert PNG to AVIF.
AVIF is designed for much better compression than older formats. In many cases, it can shrink image size dramatically while preserving strong visual quality. That makes it especially useful for site performance, Core Web Vitals, mobile delivery, and bandwidth savings.
Still, converting PNG to AVIF is not always a one-size-fits-all decision. Some images benefit more than others. Some workflows need PNG for editing and compatibility. And while AVIF support is strong in modern browsers, there are still practical reasons to keep fallback formats in certain projects.
In this guide, you will learn when to convert PNG to AVIF, what changes after conversion, how transparency behaves, which image types compress best, and how to get cleaner results with fewer surprises.
Quick action: Need to convert right now? Use PixConverter to turn PNG files into AVIF online, then come back to fine-tune your format choices.
The short answer is file size.
PNG uses lossless compression, which is great for preserving exact pixel data, but that efficiency is limited compared with newer image formats. AVIF can often deliver much smaller files at similar perceived quality, especially for web use.
That matters when you want to:
For many websites, image weight is one of the biggest performance bottlenecks. Large PNG assets can quietly slow category pages, landing pages, blog posts, product grids, and UI-heavy interfaces. Switching some of those assets to AVIF can make a noticeable difference.
Before converting, it helps to know what you are trading.
| Feature | PNG | AVIF |
|---|---|---|
| Compression type | Lossless | Usually lossy, can also support lossless |
| File size | Often large | Usually much smaller |
| Transparency | Yes | Yes |
| Browser support | Universal | Strong in modern browsers |
| Editing support | Excellent | More limited in some apps |
| Best use cases | Editing, archival graphics, universal compatibility | Web delivery, performance-focused publishing |
The most important practical changes are these:
This is the main reason people convert PNG to AVIF. Depending on the image, the reduction can be modest or dramatic. Flat graphics, transparent UI assets, and screenshots can compress very well. Product images and exported design elements can also benefit heavily.
Most AVIF web exports are lossy. That means the new file is optimized for visual similarity, not perfect one-to-one preservation. In real use, this is often acceptable, but it matters if you need exact source fidelity for editing, archival storage, or repeated re-exporting.
This is one of AVIF’s strongest advantages over older compact formats like JPG. If your PNG has a transparent background, AVIF can keep it. That makes AVIF a compelling option for overlays, logos used in web interfaces, cutout objects, and transparent design assets.
PNG opens almost everywhere. AVIF support is much better than it used to be, especially in browsers, but some older apps, CMS plugins, and editing tools still handle PNG more gracefully. For publishing, AVIF is often excellent. For broad editing compatibility, PNG still wins.
Not every PNG should be converted automatically. The best candidates are images where delivery size matters more than preserving an edit-friendly master file.
If you use transparent PNGs for badges, cutouts, callouts, layered visuals, or decorative website elements, AVIF can often cut weight significantly while keeping the same visual role on the page.
Dashboards, product tours, interface previews, and UI screenshots are commonly stored as PNG because they stay crisp. AVIF may preserve that clarity well enough for web display while reducing transfer size.
Product guides, infographics, feature callouts, and comparison graphics are often exported as PNG. If they are meant for browsing rather than editing, AVIF can be a better delivery format.
Documentation pages and tutorials often accumulate many PNG screenshots. Those files add up quickly. Converting selected images to AVIF can improve page speed without forcing you to rebuild your content strategy.
Marketing pages often use floating transparent images over colored or gradient backgrounds. These are classic PNG-heavy assets. AVIF is well suited for trimming them down.
AVIF is powerful, but there are situations where keeping PNG makes more sense.
If the file must work everywhere with no fallback planning, PNG remains safer. This matters for software uploads, legacy workflows, email assets, and environments where modern format support is uncertain.
PNG is a better working format for many design and editing tasks. If you expect to reopen, annotate, crop, retouch, or repurpose the file repeatedly, keep the PNG master.
For source archives, legal records, exact screenshots, and assets that must stay untouched at the pixel level, PNG is usually the better fit unless you intentionally create lossless AVIF and confirm your workflow supports it.
AVIF can look excellent, but harsh compression settings may soften tiny text or create edge artifacts around crisp interface elements. That does not mean AVIF is a bad choice. It means quality settings need to be chosen carefully.
The safest workflow is simple: keep your original PNG, create an AVIF export for delivery, and compare the result at real viewing size.
Compressed output is only as good as the input. Use a sharp original. Avoid repeatedly saving and re-exporting the same asset through multiple formats if possible.
If the image is a final web asset, AVIF is a strong candidate. If it is still a working source file, keep the PNG and generate AVIF only as a copy.
If the image relies on transparent background edges, inspect the output closely. Most modern conversion tools preserve alpha correctly, but visual checks are still worth doing for logos, cutouts, and anti-aliased edges.
Do not zoom to 400% and optimize for microscopic differences. Judge the result at the size users will really see on a website, phone, app screen, or article page.
If your stack serves multiple formats, keep a PNG or WebP fallback for environments where AVIF is not ideal. This is especially useful for broad publishing systems and mixed user bases.
Try the conversion: Upload your image and create a modern AVIF version with PixConverter. It is a fast way to compare file size savings before updating your site or workflow.
There is no universal percentage because image content matters so much, but AVIF often wins by a large margin.
You may see:
The only reliable answer is to test your actual files.
That is why conversion is most useful when it is part of a practical workflow rather than a theory-first format debate. If your page gets lighter and the image still looks right, the format is doing its job.
Getting good results is less about chasing the smallest possible file and more about avoiding visible damage in the wrong places.
If your PNG contains text, menus, settings panels, or code snippets, inspect small letters carefully. Compression that looks fine on shapes and backgrounds can hurt readability first.
Feathered edges, anti-aliased outlines, shadows, and semi-transparent glows should be checked on both light and dark backgrounds. This catches halo issues that may not be obvious at first glance.
Even if the visual result is excellent, it is smart to retain the PNG source. That gives you a dependable file for edits, exports, and fallback uses later.
Some logos are better as SVG if they are vector-based. Others may still be fine as PNG depending on the target. AVIF is useful for delivered raster graphics, but it is not automatically the best answer for every branding asset.
AVIF usually wins. Smaller files help pages load faster, especially on image-heavy layouts.
PNG usually wins. It is simpler, more universal, and easier to move between tools.
AVIF often wins on size, while PNG wins on compatibility. The right choice depends on where the file will be displayed.
It depends. If your screenshot has lots of text and sharp UI detail, compare carefully. AVIF may still be excellent, but settings matter more.
PNG is safer. AVIF is better thought of as a delivery format unless your archive workflow specifically supports AVIF.
Modern browser support for AVIF is now strong enough that many websites can use it confidently. But websites are not the only destination for images.
Ask these questions before replacing PNG files at scale:
If the image exists only for modern web delivery, AVIF is often a strong upgrade. If it needs broad downstream flexibility, keep PNG in the workflow too.
This approach avoids most format regrets. You get the speed benefit without sacrificing the usefulness of the original file.
PNG to AVIF is not the only path worth considering. Depending on your project, these related tools may help:
Do not throw away originals. AVIF is excellent for delivery, but source preservation still matters.
Different images behave differently. A flat icon, a UI screenshot, and a transparent product cutout should not be judged identically.
Transparent assets should be checked against multiple background colors. This is where subtle problems show up.
If text becomes harder to read or interface detail gets muddy, the file may be too compressed even if the size savings look impressive.
Yes. AVIF supports transparency, which is one of the main reasons it is useful as a PNG alternative for modern web delivery.
Usually, AVIF conversion for web delivery is lossy, so the file may not be pixel-identical to the PNG. However, the visible difference can be very small while the size savings are substantial.
For many web delivery scenarios, yes. AVIF often provides much smaller files and faster loading. PNG is still better for universal compatibility and editable source files.
Yes, but check text and sharp edges carefully. Some screenshots compress beautifully, while others need gentler settings to stay crisp.
No. It is better to keep the PNG as your master or backup file and use AVIF as the delivery version.
Keep a fallback format such as PNG or WebP depending on your workflow and audience. Many publishers use multiple formats together.
Converting PNG to AVIF is one of the most practical ways to modernize image delivery without giving up transparency. If your current PNG assets are slowing pages down, increasing storage costs, or bloating mobile experiences, AVIF is worth testing immediately.
The key is not to treat conversion as a blind replacement project. Keep your PNG originals. Use AVIF where speed matters. Compare visuals in real conditions. Then publish the lighter version with confidence.
Use PixConverter to create smaller, modern image files in just a few steps.
If you are optimizing a website, building a design workflow, or just trying to shrink oversized graphics, PixConverter gives you a fast way to test the right output format for the job.
