Finally a truly free unlimited converter! Convert unlimited images online – 100% free, no sign-up required

Image Metadata Explained: What Information Is Hidden Inside Your Photos?

Date published: January 29, 2026
Last update: January 29, 2026
Author: Marek Hovorka

Category: Image Formats Explained
Tags:

Most images contain hidden metadata such as EXIF, GPS location, device details, and editing history.

Your image is more than just pixels

When most people think about images, they think about what they see: colors, shapes, faces, and composition.
But every image file usually contains far more information than meets the eye.

Hidden inside your photos is something called image metadata.

This metadata can include:

  • the device used to take the photo,
  • the date and time it was created,
  • camera settings like ISO, shutter speed, or aperture,
  • sometimes even GPS location,
  • software history (editing tools, exports, conversions).

If you upload images to a website, send them by email, or convert them online, this hidden data may travel with the image — unless it is handled correctly.

Understanding image metadata is essential if you care about:

  • privacy
  • SEO
  • performance
  • professional image handling

Let’s break it down from the ground up.

What is image metadata?

Image metadata is structured information embedded directly inside an image file.

Think of it as a digital label attached to the photo, storing technical and descriptive details about the image.

Metadata is not visible when you open the image normally, but it can be:

  • read by software,
  • extracted by websites,
  • indexed by systems,
  • or accidentally shared.

In many cases, users don’t even realize it exists.

The three main types of image metadata

Most modern images use one or more of the following metadata standards:

1️⃣ EXIF metadata (Exchangeable Image File Format)

EXIF data is mainly technical.

It is automatically added by:

  • smartphones,
  • digital cameras,
  • some editing software.

Typical EXIF fields include:

  • camera model (e.g. iPhone 14 Pro, Canon EOS R),
  • exposure time,
  • ISO value,
  • focal length,
  • date & time,
  • GPS coordinates (if enabled).

EXIF data is extremely common in:

  • JPG
  • HEIC
  • TIFF
  • sometimes PNG (less common)

2️⃣ IPTC metadata (International Press Telecommunications Council)

IPTC metadata is descriptive and editorial.

It is often used by:

  • journalists,
  • photographers,
  • media agencies,
  • stock photo platforms.

Common IPTC fields:

  • author name,
  • copyright information,
  • image title,
  • description,
  • keywords,
  • usage rights.

From an SEO perspective, IPTC can be useful — but only in specific workflows (more on that later).

3️⃣ XMP metadata (Extensible Metadata Platform)

XMP is a modern, flexible metadata framework, developed by Adobe.

It can store:

  • editing history,
  • color profiles,
  • layered information,
  • software-specific data.

XMP is often used in:

  • Photoshop
  • Lightroom
  • professional workflows

It can coexist with EXIF and IPTC in the same image file.

Why image metadata exists in the first place

Metadata isn’t evil — in fact, it’s extremely useful.

Originally, metadata was designed to:

  • help photographers analyze settings,
  • allow editors to track authorship,
  • preserve technical accuracy,
  • manage large image libraries.

For professionals, metadata is a powerful tool.

For regular users, however, it often becomes:

  • unnecessary,
  • invisible,
  • or even risky.

Real-world example: What your phone adds automatically

Take a photo with your smartphone and you may unintentionally embed:

  • exact date and time,
  • phone brand and model,
  • lens type,
  • camera serial number,
  • GPS location (street-level accuracy).

If you upload that image:

  • to a blog,
  • to a forum,
  • to a public converter,
  • or send it to someone,

you might be sharing far more than you intended.

Metadata and privacy: the silent risk

One of the biggest issues with image metadata is unintentional data leakage.

Examples:

  • A real estate photo revealing the exact location of a private home
  • A travel image exposing where and when it was taken
  • A personal photo linking back to a specific device
  • A company image revealing internal software workflows

Many people assume that “converting an image” automatically cleans this data.

That is not always true.

Does converting an image remove metadata?

Short answer: sometimes — but not always.

It depends on:

  • the converter,
  • the target format,
  • the conversion method,
  • privacy policy of the tool.

Some converters:

  • keep all metadata,
  • partially strip it,
  • or remove it entirely.

This is why choosing the right image conversion tool matters.

Metadata vs file size and performance

Metadata also affects performance, although indirectly.

While metadata usually doesn’t take much space, large images may contain:

  • extensive EXIF blocks,
  • thumbnails,
  • editing history.

On high-traffic websites, every unnecessary byte matters.

For web optimization:

  • metadata is often removed,
  • images are stripped to the bare minimum,
  • focus is on visual quality + speed.

Why this matters for websites and SEO

Search engines don’t directly rank pages based on image metadata — but metadata still influences:

  • page speed
  • image delivery
  • privacy compliance
  • trust signals
  • professional workflows

A well-optimized image strategy considers:

  • format (JPG, PNG, WebP, AVIF),
  • compression,
  • metadata handling,
  • conversion pipeline.

This is exactly where online image converters come into play.

How Different Image Formats Handle Metadata (JPG, PNG, WebP, HEIC, AVIF)

Not all image formats treat metadata the same

One of the biggest misconceptions about images is the idea that metadata works the same everywhere.

In reality, each image format handles metadata differently:

  • some formats preserve it by default,
  • others strip it aggressively,
  • some allow metadata but rarely use it,
  • modern formats are much more privacy-aware.

If you convert images online, this difference is absolutely critical.

Let’s go format by format.

JPG (JPEG): The metadata heavyweight

JPG is one of the oldest and most widely used image formats — and also one of the most metadata-heavy.

JPG supports:

  • EXIF
  • IPTC
  • XMP

All three can coexist inside a single JPG file.

This means JPG images often contain:

  • full camera information,
  • GPS coordinates,
  • editing history,
  • author and copyright data.

What happens during JPG conversion?

If you:

  • convert JPG → JPG,
  • resize JPG,
  • compress JPG,

metadata usually stays intact unless the converter explicitly removes it.

This is why many people unknowingly publish:

  • personal photos,
  • screenshots,
  • private images

with full metadata still embedded.

SEO & privacy implications of JPG metadata

For most websites:

  • metadata is not needed,
  • metadata does not improve Google rankings,
  • metadata can leak private information.

Best practice for the web:

  • strip unnecessary metadata,
  • keep only pixels + color profile (if needed).

PNG: Metadata exists, but is less common

PNG supports metadata through:

  • text chunks (tEXt, iTXt),
  • XMP blocks (less common),
  • limited EXIF (rare but possible).

However:

  • most PNG files contain little to no metadata,
  • smartphones usually don’t store EXIF in PNG,
  • screenshots are typically metadata-light.

When PNG metadata matters

PNG metadata is mostly relevant when:

  • images are exported from design software,
  • logos include copyright data,
  • screenshots contain software identifiers.

Compared to JPG:

  • PNG is less risky in terms of hidden data,
  • but not completely metadata-free.

WebP: Modern, efficient, metadata-aware

WebP was designed with the modern web in mind.

It supports:

  • EXIF
  • XMP
  • ICC color profiles

But here’s the key difference:

👉 WebP metadata is optional and often stripped by default.

Many WebP converters:

  • remove metadata automatically,
  • keep only essential color information,
  • optimize for performance.

Why Google loves WebP (metadata-wise)

From a web performance and privacy standpoint:

  • WebP encourages clean image delivery,
  • metadata is not required,
  • files are smaller and faster.

This aligns perfectly with:

  • Core Web Vitals,
  • mobile-first indexing,
  • privacy-friendly design.

HEIC (HEIF): Rich metadata by design

HEIC (used by iPhones) is based on HEIF and is designed to be feature-rich.

HEIC commonly stores:

  • extensive EXIF data,
  • depth maps,
  • burst photo references,
  • orientation and HDR info,
  • editing instructions (non-destructive edits).

This makes HEIC great for:

  • mobile photography,
  • Apple ecosystem workflows.

But problematic for:

  • web publishing,
  • sharing,
  • privacy.

HEIC → JPG / WebP conversion impact

When converting HEIC:

  • metadata may be partially preserved,
  • or completely removed,
  • depending on the converter.

A good online converter should:

  • flatten edits,
  • remove unnecessary metadata,
  • output a clean web-friendly file.

AVIF: The future with privacy in mind

AVIF is one of the newest image formats and takes a minimalist approach.

AVIF supports:

  • metadata technically,
  • but discourages unnecessary baggage.

In practice:

  • most AVIF images are metadata-light,
  • many converters strip metadata by default,
  • focus is on compression efficiency.

AVIF and next-generation web images

AVIF aligns with:

  • performance-first web design,
  • privacy-conscious publishing,
  • modern image pipelines.

That makes it ideal for:

  • blogs,
  • landing pages,
  • SaaS websites,
  • image-heavy platforms.

Format comparison: metadata behavior overview

Format Metadata Support Typical Metadata Size Privacy Risk
JPG Very high Medium–Large High
PNG Limited Small Low–Medium
WebP Optional Very small Low
HEIC Very high Large High
AVIF Minimal Very small Very low

Why converters play a critical role

The format alone doesn’t decide everything.

What really matters:

  • how the conversion is implemented,
  • whether metadata is intentionally stripped,
  • whether users are informed about it.

Bad converters:

  • keep metadata without warning,
  • store uploaded images,
  • don’t explain data handling.

Good converters:

  • remove metadata by default,
  • process files securely,
  • delete uploads immediately.

What this means for PixConverter users

When users convert images for:

  • websites,
  • social media,
  • SEO,
  • sharing,

they usually want:

  • smaller files,
  • faster loading,
  • no hidden data,
  • maximum privacy.

Understanding format-level metadata behavior is step one.

What Really Happens to Your Metadata When You Convert Images Online

When you upload an image to an online converter, a lot happens behind the scenes in a very short time.

From the user’s perspective:

  • you upload a file,
  • choose a format,
  • download the result.

From a technical perspective:

  • the image is parsed,
  • decoded,
  • processed,
  • re-encoded,
  • possibly stored,
  • possibly logged.

Metadata is involved at almost every step.

Understanding this process is essential if you care about privacy, trust, and control over your files.

Step-by-step: image conversion behind the scenes

1️⃣ Upload and temporary storage

Most online converters:

  • upload the image to a server,
  • store it temporarily (RAM or disk),
  • generate a processing job.

At this stage:

  • all metadata is still present,
  • EXIF, IPTC, XMP are intact.

If the service stores files longer than necessary, metadata remains accessible.

2️⃣ Image decoding

The converter software reads:

  • pixel data,
  • color profile,
  • metadata blocks.

Important:

  • decoding metadata does not automatically remove it,
  • it only makes it readable for processing.

Some tools copy metadata blindly during decoding.

3️⃣ Processing and transformation

This includes:

  • resizing,
  • format conversion,
  • compression,
  • color conversion.

Here is where behavior differs dramatically.

Some converters:

  • explicitly strip metadata,
  • selectively keep parts (like color profile),
  • copy everything by default.

Others:

  • do nothing and let metadata pass through untouched.

4️⃣ Re-encoding and output

During export:

  • metadata can be reattached,
  • omitted,
  • or rewritten.

This is the critical decision point.

A privacy-aware converter:

  • outputs a clean image,
  • includes no EXIF, GPS, or device info,
  • keeps only essential technical data if needed.

A careless converter:

  • outputs a visually optimized image,
  • but keeps all hidden data.

5️⃣ Download and cleanup

After conversion:

  • the user downloads the image,
  • the server should delete the original and output files.

Unfortunately:

  • not all services delete immediately,
  • some keep files for hours or days,
  • some analyze uploads for “improvement” or “analytics”.

Metadata is still part of those stored files.

Common myths about online image converters

❌ Myth 1: “Conversion automatically removes metadata”

False.

Many converters:

  • keep metadata unless told otherwise,
  • prioritize speed over privacy,
  • reuse original EXIF blocks.

Never assume metadata is removed.

❌ Myth 2: “Free converters don’t care about my data”

Also false.

Some free tools:

  • log uploaded files,
  • scan metadata,
  • analyze camera models and locations,
  • use this data for internal metrics or ads.

Even if images aren’t published, metadata still exists.

❌ Myth 3: “Only photos have metadata”

Not true.

Metadata can exist in:

  • screenshots,
  • exported graphics,
  • PDFs converted to images,
  • AI-generated images,
  • design assets.

Anything that passes through software can accumulate metadata.

Metadata and GDPR / privacy regulations

Metadata can be considered personal data if it contains:

  • GPS coordinates,
  • device identifiers,
  • timestamps linked to individuals.

This matters for:

  • EU-based users,
  • businesses handling user uploads,
  • websites processing client images.

Privacy-first image tools should:

  • minimize data retention,
  • avoid unnecessary metadata storage,
  • clearly state data handling policies.

What users should expect from a safe image converter

A trustworthy online image converter should:

✔ Process files in memory or short-lived storage
✔ Strip EXIF, IPTC, and XMP by default
✔ Never expose GPS or device data
✔ Delete files immediately after conversion
✔ Clearly explain its privacy behavior

Anything less is a compromise.

Metadata vs quality: an important clarification

Removing metadata:

  • does not reduce image quality,
  • does not affect resolution,
  • does not change colors (if ICC is preserved).

It only removes non-visual data.

This is why metadata stripping is almost always recommended for:

  • websites,
  • social media,
  • blogs,
  • public sharing.

Why this matters for SEO-focused websites

From an SEO standpoint:

  • metadata does not boost rankings,
  • smaller files improve page speed,
  • faster pages improve Core Web Vitals,
  • cleaner images improve trust.

Search engines reward:

  • performance,
  • privacy,
  • good user experience.

Best Practices for Image Privacy, SEO, and Safe Online Conversion

In today’s web ecosystem, images are no longer just decorative elements.
They directly influence:

  • page speed,
  • SEO performance,
  • user trust,
  • privacy compliance,
  • and overall professionalism.

Handling image metadata correctly is a small technical detail that creates huge downstream benefits.

Let’s put everything together.

When should metadata be kept — and when removed?

Keep metadata only if:

  • you are a professional photographer delivering originals,
  • you need copyright or authorship embedded,
  • images are used in closed, internal systems,
  • metadata is part of a legal or editorial workflow.

Remove metadata if images are:

  • published on websites,
  • used in blog posts,
  • uploaded to social media,
  • shared publicly,
  • optimized for SEO,
  • part of marketing materials,
  • sent to clients or users.

For 90% of web use cases, metadata is unnecessary baggage.

Image privacy best practices (simple & effective)

1️⃣ Strip metadata by default

The safest default is:

no EXIF, no GPS, no device info, no editing history.

This prevents accidental data leaks and simplifies compliance.

2️⃣ Use modern image formats

Prefer formats designed for the web:

  • WebP
  • AVIF

They offer:

  • smaller file sizes,
  • faster loading,
  • better compression,
  • cleaner metadata handling.

3️⃣ Optimize before publishing — not after

Image optimization should happen:

  • before uploading to your CMS,
  • before publishing blog posts,
  • before sharing assets publicly.

This avoids:

  • bloated media libraries,
  • slow pages,
  • repeated conversions.

4️⃣ Never trust “silent” converters

If a tool:

  • doesn’t explain metadata handling,
  • doesn’t mention file deletion,
  • has unclear privacy policy,

you should assume metadata may be preserved or logged.

Transparency matters.

SEO impact: why clean images rank better indirectly

While Google doesn’t rank pages based on image metadata content, metadata still affects SEO indirectly through:

✅ Faster page load times

Smaller images = better Core Web Vitals.

✅ Better mobile experience

Lean images load faster on mobile networks.

✅ Improved crawl efficiency

Search engines prefer fast, lightweight pages.

✅ Higher trust signals

Privacy-respecting sites align with modern web standards.

SEO today is not about tricks — it’s about overall quality.

Recommended image workflow for websites & blogs

A clean, scalable workflow looks like this:

  1. Upload original image
  2. Convert to WebP or AVIF
  3. Resize to actual display size
  4. Strip metadata
  5. Compress intelligently
  6. Publish optimized version only

This approach:

  • saves bandwidth,
  • speeds up your site,
  • protects privacy,
  • simplifies long-term maintenance.

Frequently asked questions

Does removing metadata reduce image quality?

No. Metadata has zero impact on visual quality.

Can metadata affect website performance?

Yes — indirectly through larger file sizes and slower delivery.

Is metadata visible to website visitors?

Usually no, but it can be extracted by tools and crawlers.

Is metadata required for SEO?

No. Alt text, filenames, and context matter — not EXIF.

Final checklist before publishing images online

Before you publish any image, ask yourself:

✔ Is the format web-optimized?
✔ Is the resolution appropriate?
✔ Is metadata removed?
✔ Is the file size as small as possible?
✔ Is privacy respected?

If yes → publish with confidence.

Final thoughts

Image optimization isn’t just about compression anymore.
It’s about performance, privacy, and professionalism.

Understanding metadata — and controlling it — puts you ahead of most websites.

Clean images are not optional in 2026.
They’re the standard.