Finally a truly free unlimited converter! Convert unlimited images online – 100% free, no sign-up required
Menu
CZ | EN
Date published: June 18, 2026
Last update: June 18, 2026
Author: Marek Hovorka
Category: Image Conversion Guides
Tags: AVIF image format, Image compression, png to avif, transparent images, website performance
Learn when it makes sense to convert PNG to AVIF, how quality and transparency behave, what file size gains to expect, and how to use AVIF without breaking your workflow.
PNG is one of the safest image formats on the web. It preserves detail, supports transparency, and works almost everywhere. The downside is familiar: large file sizes. If you are publishing interface graphics, logos, illustrations, screenshots, or transparent assets, PNG can become heavy fast.
That is where AVIF becomes interesting. Converting PNG to AVIF can cut file size dramatically while still keeping sharp edges, transparency, and strong visual quality. For many modern websites, that means faster page loads, lower bandwidth use, and better image delivery without changing the way the image looks to most visitors.
Still, PNG to AVIF is not automatically the right move for every file. Some assets benefit a lot. Others are better left as PNG, SVG, or even WebP depending on how they are used.
In this guide, you will learn what really changes when you convert PNG to AVIF, when it works best, what tradeoffs to watch for, and how to do it cleanly with an online workflow.
Quick start: If you already know you want smaller PNG-based assets for the web, use PixConverter to convert them quickly, then test a few quality levels before publishing at scale.
When you convert a PNG to AVIF, you are not just changing the file extension. You are changing the compression method and, in many cases, the storage logic behind the image.
PNG uses lossless compression. That means it tries to preserve the original pixel data exactly. This is useful for graphics that need precision, but it often leads to large files.
AVIF is a newer format designed for much better compression efficiency. It can be used in both lossy and lossless modes, though many practical conversions use lossy AVIF because that is where the biggest size savings happen. Even then, AVIF often keeps images looking extremely close to the original while reducing file size far more than PNG.
In practical terms, converting PNG to AVIF often means:
Most people do it for one reason: efficiency.
PNG is dependable, but it is often oversized for delivery on websites and web apps. If an image is mostly being viewed rather than edited, AVIF can be a much leaner delivery format.
Smaller images mean less data to transfer. That can improve page speed, especially on image-heavy pages, landing pages, ecommerce listings, blogs, and documentation sites.
AVIF supports transparency, so many PNG assets with clear backgrounds can be converted without losing that feature. This is helpful for logos, badges, overlays, product cutouts, and UI elements.
If you serve large numbers of images, shrinking each asset can add up quickly. Smaller files can reduce CDN usage, improve caching efficiency, and make uploads easier for teams.
Many developers now generate next-gen image formats automatically. AVIF often becomes part of a responsive image workflow alongside WebP and fallback formats.
| Feature | PNG | AVIF |
|---|---|---|
| Compression type | Lossless | Lossy or lossless |
| Typical file size | Larger | Much smaller in many cases |
| Transparency support | Yes | Yes |
| Editing friendliness | Very strong | Less convenient in some apps |
| Browser support | Excellent | Strong in modern browsers |
| Best for | Editing masters, exact assets, universal use | Web delivery, performance-focused publishing |
| Text and line art | Excellent | Can be excellent, depends on settings |
If you have exported graphics, hero illustrations, overlays, charts, or screenshots and the PNG files are much larger than they need to be, AVIF is worth testing.
This is especially true if your main goal is front-end delivery rather than editing.
Many teams use PNG because they need transparency. That is reasonable, but transparency does not automatically mean PNG is the best delivery format. AVIF can preserve alpha transparency while often reducing size significantly.
If a single image appears in multiple templates, banners, category pages, or product cards, reducing that one asset can create cumulative performance gains.
Some screenshots convert very well to AVIF. Others may need careful testing if tiny text or high-contrast interface details must remain perfectly crisp. In many cases, AVIF still performs well, but quality settings matter.
Even though AVIF is powerful, PNG still has important strengths.
If the image will be opened, revised, annotated, layered into designs, or passed through multiple tools, PNG is often the safer working format. AVIF is better thought of as a delivery format in many workflows.
If you need exact pixel reproduction with no variation at all, PNG remains ideal. This includes some technical diagrams, certain texture assets, precision overlays, or QA reference files.
If the file is going into a legacy CMS, older app, email workflow, offline system, or unknown upload environment, PNG may be more predictable.
If the image is actually a logo, icon, or vector illustration with simple shapes, SVG may beat both PNG and AVIF for scalability and size. If you need raster output, then compare exported PNG, WebP, and AVIF carefully.
Yes, AVIF supports transparency. That is one of the main reasons PNG users consider it in the first place.
However, preserving transparency is not the same as preserving every edge perfectly at every compression level. Semi-transparent edges, anti-aliased shadows, and subtle glows usually survive well, but aggressive compression can introduce visible changes around fine details.
That means you should always inspect:
For critical UI or branding assets, test a few versions before replacing every PNG on your site.
There is no single percentage that applies to every image, but the difference can be substantial.
In many real cases, AVIF files can be dramatically smaller than PNG while still looking visually similar at normal viewing sizes. The biggest gains often happen with:
The savings may be smaller for tiny icons, extremely simple graphics, or images already optimized in another way.
The right approach is to compare the actual output, not assume. Size savings only matter if the visual result remains acceptable for your use case.
AVIF is efficient, but strong compression can create subtle issues if pushed too far. These are the most common things to check after conversion.
Tiny UI text, labels in screenshots, or thin typography can lose some sharpness if compression is too aggressive.
Some high-contrast edges may show minor smoothing. This matters most in logos, diagrams, and screenshots.
Smooth color transitions usually do well in AVIF, but low settings can still create artifacts in delicate gradients.
Always inspect anti-aliased cutouts, especially around hair, soft shadows, and translucent elements.
If any of these issues appear, raise the quality setting or keep the original PNG for that specific asset.
Instead of asking for one universal best setting, think in tiers.
Use conservative compression. Prioritize edge clarity and transparency quality over maximum size reduction.
Use moderate to high quality. Zoom in on text and icons before finalizing.
You can usually compress more aggressively, especially if the image is displayed below full size or used as a supporting visual rather than a critical reference image.
Keep the original PNG. Use AVIF only as a delivery copy.
This process is simple, but it prevents mass conversion mistakes.
Tool CTA: Ready to test your files? Open PixConverter, upload a PNG, convert it to AVIF, and compare the result before updating your site assets.
Some teams benefit more than others.
Blogs, magazines, documentation sites, and landing pages can reduce image weight noticeably by replacing oversized PNGs.
Transparent product graphics, badges, and promotional overlays often convert well.
UI screenshots, walkthrough graphics, and dashboard previews can often be delivered more efficiently in AVIF.
If image weight is affecting performance targets, AVIF is worth testing as part of a broader image strategy.
Keep your PNG source. Delivery formats should not replace working originals.
Not every PNG deserves conversion. Small assets, pixel-exact files, and edit-heavy images may not benefit enough.
Review images at realistic display size and at close inspection. Both views matter.
Before switching formats in a CMS or product workflow, confirm the platform accepts and serves AVIF properly.
If your goal is simply to make PNG files lighter, you may also compare AVIF with WebP.
In many cases, AVIF can produce smaller files than WebP at comparable visual quality. But WebP still has strong compatibility and is widely used across tools and websites. Some pipelines even serve both, with AVIF as the more advanced option.
If you are unsure which one fits better, practical testing is more useful than theory. A good workflow is to export both, compare file size, compare visual quality, and then choose based on your real environment.
If you want to try that route too, PixConverter also supports related format changes such as PNG to WebP and WebP to PNG.
The safest strategy is to think of AVIF as a delivery optimization layer.
Format choice helps, but it works best when combined with sensible dimensions, lazy loading, and responsive image handling.
For web delivery, often yes. For editing, exact pixel preservation, and maximum compatibility, PNG is often still better. They serve different roles.
It can, depending on settings. Many AVIF conversions look nearly identical to the original at normal viewing sizes, but lossy compression can alter fine details if pushed too far.
Yes. AVIF supports transparency, which makes it a strong candidate for replacing many web-delivery PNG files.
Yes, and many screenshots compress very well. Just inspect tiny text and high-contrast UI edges carefully.
No. Keep the PNG as your master or backup file. Use AVIF as a delivery version.
Support is strong in modern browsers, but some apps, workflows, or older systems may not handle it as smoothly as PNG. Test before adopting it everywhere.
PNG often starts as a lossless graphic format and may include transparency. JPG is already lossy and usually used for photos. Conversion decisions depend on the source image type and whether transparency matters.
Converting PNG to AVIF can be a smart way to modernize image delivery, especially when file size is slowing down your pages or making transparent graphics unnecessarily heavy. The biggest wins usually come from web-focused assets that need to look clean but do not need to remain in a fully editable, pixel-exact source format.
The key is not to treat AVIF as a blind replacement for every PNG. Instead, use it selectively, test quality carefully, and keep your originals. That gives you the best of both worlds: efficient delivery and reliable source files.
Need to convert or compare image formats quickly? PixConverter makes it easy to switch formats for web delivery, editing compatibility, and upload requirements.
Start now at PixConverter.io and test the best format for your images in just a few clicks.
